Google Photos will soon be discontinued. at least, Convenient free service we The one that has stored photos for years is finally a hit Storage limit. Beyond that, you will have to pay to save your photos. That’s not great, but wHats are almost as annoying The horrifying tactic Google uses to persuade free users to switch to paid subscriptions.
As Paul Moncton of Forbes wrote last week:
“In a recent subscriber email, the Google Photos team outlined a new premium editing feature available only to paid Google One customers, but this email goes from high quality to original quality uploads. It also contains a slightly surprising section that encourages users to switch to run out of storage quotas, otherwise there is a risk of seemingly disastrous consequences.
According to the email, “Original quality photos retain the most detail and can be enlarged, cropped and printed with less pixelation.” This statement is objectively true, but Google It’s incompatible with what we’ve told us about high quality options in the past. “
Google too Stopped in Photo to explain Apparent, The perceptible difference between the “original” quality setting and the “high” quality setting. But their example is A little suspicious-it’s a shot Visible bird Perfect On the “original quality” side, crazy or The “high quality” side is blurry. (I didn’t receive the email from google myself or drop it here For you to judge.. )
G / O media may receive fees
But google To be Security guard..What is a company actually High quality photos are stored up to 16MP, or 4920 x 3264 pixels, o oOriginal quality images are (obviously) stored with no restrictions on file size, number of pixels, or size.In theory allows you to truncate to smaller pieces of high quality Image and still hold High enough level For example, details for printing a copy than If you cropped to the same section of a low resolution image, this may not be the case.
I’ve acknowledged. But is the difference as jarring as Google makes? As a starting point, if you’re taking a selfie, it’s likely that your image hasn’t reached the 16MP limit for Google Photos “high quality” images in the first place... For example, this shows the same image in succession. The first is the original image and the second is the download of the “high quality” image from Google Photos.
I have it Indistinguishable the difference When staring at a small version of a photo on a website. Feel free to download it to your computer if needed. I did, and when Flipping Between the two of the Windows 10 photo app, I see Don’t worry the difference anything. (((Also, the files have exactly the same resolution. )
Then I switched it and took a regular image using the Samsung Note 20 Ultra-12MP, or 4000 x 3000 pixels. This is lower than Google’s 16MP limit, so I thought there would be little difference, if any. The original file I shot is now at the same resolution as the version of Google Photos I downloaded (of course). Google’s compression halved the file size, but had no noticeable impact on quality.
Then upload the 108MP image, 12000 x 9000, using the high quality settings and Google will shrink it to 4618 x 3464 (16MP). When staring at both images in succession on a 1440p display, the only difference I actually see is that the Google version is actually slightly visible. Sharper —Probably a by-product of that compression technology.
Of course, cropping a portion of that image will probably result in higher quality. Taken overall From Image with With more pixel data Much less. Especially when printing images, there is no problem. At a size larger than the size that works best for small cropped photos. Blasting an image and estimating details that aren’t there is more risky and quality problematic than other methods. Large images are scaled down to fit a particular print size. Or tIn other words, increasing the number of pixels per inch is generally a good thing. If everything else is equal, you can: Print a larger image No perceived deterioration in quality.
I’ll leave these two crops here for discussion, but the quality difference is what you’ll experience if you’re tinkering with image size or when. This crop of my huge image gave me something pretty heavy to play with 6056 x 3406 pixels, or 20.63 megapixels (20.2 x 11.4 inch image at 300ppi). However, the smaller image fits in 2326 x 1308, or about 3MP (7.8 x 4.4 inch image at 300ppi).
If you magnify a small image to fit the size of a large image and print it, you will definitely get a blurry image. the difference A little On a normal monitor, at least in this case, even the cropped file is less perceptible because it is about the same size as the monitor’s default resolution. (that is I had 4K display (only if) To notice the difference more).
So google is Correct when paying attention to it Save the largest image possible in Google Photos will you do Provides images with less blur if needed produce Print a part of it Out in a larger size. I’ve acknowledged. The same applies when you cut out a part of a huge image and turn it into a desktop wallpaper.If the original image is huge, you will get more value for your money..
But is this something very important other than these rare ones? Use Case? No if you are shooting below 16MP. In that case, you can’t even get the most out of the “high quality” of Google Photos.If so, you can always crop and upload the image as you like It To Google Photos. This is a much better scenario than uploading to Google Photos, reducing it to a 16 megapixel image, and cropping it from there.
As they know, I generally think Google’s scary tactics are a bit more than useful advice People panic when they see blurry “high quality” photos and start collecting money in Google’s way for storage subscriptions that allow them to upload original quality images to Google Photos. We is finally all there (Unless you switch to another service), But don’t jump to you necessary Daringly.For most people, your image quality is perfectly appropriate, Paid Whether it is a subscription..
Don’t let Google scare you to pay for Google Photos